<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LOGGING or NOLOGGING, that is the question &#8211; Part VIII</title>
	<link>http://oraclenz.com/2009/03/30/logging-or-nologging-that-is-the-question-part-viii/</link>
	<description>#1 Oracle Blog in NZ</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Damir Vadas</title>
		<link>http://oraclenz.com/2009/03/30/logging-or-nologging-that-is-the-question-part-viii/#comment-11468</link>
		<author>Damir Vadas</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oraclenz.com/2009/03/30/logging-or-nologging-that-is-the-question-part-viii/#comment-11468</guid>
		<description>Francisco,
Script for generation of redo logs, is very similar one on my blog site (http://damir-vadas.blogspot.com/2009/10/enterpise-backup-strategy.html) in totally different context.
So let me give you a small hint.

"count(trunc(FIRST_TIME)) Total" 
can be also
"COUNT(*) Total"
which is less CPU consumable then your version.
Regards,
Damir Vadas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francisco,<br />
Script for generation of redo logs, is very similar one on my blog site (http://damir-vadas.blogspot.com/2009/10/enterpise-backup-strategy.html) in totally different context.<br />
So let me give you a small hint.</p>
<p>&#8220;count(trunc(FIRST_TIME)) Total&#8221;<br />
can be also<br />
&#8220;COUNT(*) Total&#8221;<br />
which is less CPU consumable then your version.<br />
Regards,<br />
Damir Vadas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin</title>
		<link>http://oraclenz.com/2009/03/30/logging-or-nologging-that-is-the-question-part-viii/#comment-10554</link>
		<author>Sachin</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oraclenz.com/2009/03/30/logging-or-nologging-that-is-the-question-part-viii/#comment-10554</guid>
		<description>Francisco Munoz Alvarez,

Finding session generating high redo can be done using the way you suggested.
However - if the need is to find SQLs that are generating high redo - how will we find that. I know we can use v$session's sql_id column to find which sql - the session is running, but the v$sesstat will not maintain the redo for sql.

Any idea how to find that?

Regards,
Sachin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francisco Munoz Alvarez,</p>
<p>Finding session generating high redo can be done using the way you suggested.<br />
However - if the need is to find SQLs that are generating high redo - how will we find that. I know we can use v$session&#8217;s sql_id column to find which sql - the session is running, but the v$sesstat will not maintain the redo for sql.</p>
<p>Any idea how to find that?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Sachin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
